RESUMO
ABSTRACT Aim To prepare a consensus document of the cariology contents and competences included in the curriculum for the dentistry degree at Argentine dental faculties/schools Materials and Method Planning the process in stages: Stage 1- Diagnosis of the situation (Google Form) and invitation to participate extended to the 20 academic units that offer dentistry degrees. Stage 2- Assessment process of Content (C) and Competences (I) agreements in the five domains: D1 Basic Sciences, D2 Risk and diagnosis of dental caries, D3 Decision-making for non-invasive treatments, D4 Decision-making for invasive treatment, and D5 Evidence-based cariology at community level. Stage 3- Consensus. Stages 2 and 3 were held in Workshop format in virtual mode (W) Results Stage 1- Of the total 20 Google forms sent to the AU, 13 responses were received: 7 from National Universities and 6 from Private Universities. All participants agreed to be part of the consensus. Stage 2- W: 20 representatives from 10 AU participated. It began with a contextualizing conference, after which the representatives were divided into 5 groups to assess the agreements of each D. Stage 3- The Cariology Curriculum document was organized into 5 Domains, and 23 C and 31 I of clinical application were defined for teaching cariology. The contents and competences for each domain were agreed upon. The final document was sent to all W participants for their approval and dissemination in each AU involved Conclusion Cariology contents were defined for dentistry students at Universities in the Argentine Republic.
RESUMEN Objetivo Elaborar un documento de consenso de los contenidos y competencias de cariología en el currículo para las facultades/escuelas de odontología argentinas, a nivel del grado Materiales y Método El proceso de creación se efectuó en etapas: 1- Diagnóstico de situación (Formulario electrónico) e invitación a participar a las 20 unidades académicas (UA) donde se imparte la carrera de odontología. 2- Proceso de valoración de acuerdos de Contenidos (C) y Competencias (I) en los cinco dominios (D): D1: Ciencias Básicas; D2: Riesgo y diagnóstico de caries dental; D3: Toma de decisiones tratamientos no invasivos; D4: Toma de decisiones para el tratamiento invasivo y D5: Cariología basada en la evidencia a nivel comunitario. 3- Etapa de consenso. Las etapas 2 y 3 se efectuaron en formato de Workshop en modalidad virtual (W) Resultados Etapa 1: Del total de 20 formularios enviados a las UA se recibieron 13 respuestas (65%), 7 (53,8%) de Universidades Nacionales y 6 (46,1%) de gestión Privada. El 100% de los participantes estuvieron de acuerdo en formar parte del consenso. Etapa 2: W: Participaron 20 representantes de 10 UA. El proceso se inició con una conferencia contextualizadora, posteriormente los representantes fueron divididos en 5 grupos para la valoración de acuerdos de cada D. Etapa 3: El documento de658. 658.l Currículo en Cariología se organizó en 5 Dominios. Se definieron 23 C y 31 I de aplicación clínica para la enseñanza de la Cariología. Se consensuaron los contenidos y las competencias para cada uno de los dominios. El documento final fue enviado a todos los participantes del W para su aprobación y difusión en cada una de las UA involucradas Conclusión En base al trabajo realizado se determinó un consenso de competencias y contenidos en cariología para estudiantes de grado de Odontología, de las Universidades de la República Argentina.
RESUMO
O presente estudo tem como objetivo apresentar uma discussão de índole constitucional sobre a pesquisa de células-tronco humanas. Iniciou-se a abordagem do tema proposto com a elucidação da diferença entre língua e linguagem para poder chegar na interpretação constitucional com ênfase nos direitos fundamentais e, por derradeiro uma abordagem acerca da pesquisa de células-tronco humanas com um olhar da bioética. Dentre esses direitos fundamentais será sobre o direito à vida que gravitarão as celeumas e conclusões do presente trabalho. Partindo da discussão travada na mais alta corte de justiça do país (STF) de quando se começa a vida, para que sobre tal decisão fosse julgada a Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade (ADI N) a fim de elucidar se a pesquisa com células-tronco humanas embrionárias viola o direito à vida, bem como se há violação da dignidade da pessoa humana.
This study aims to present a discussion of research on the constitutional nature of human stem cells. It started to approach the theme with the elucidation of the difference between language and language to get the constitutional interpretation with emphasis on fundamental rights, and last about a stem cell research with a look of bioethics. Among these fundamental rights will be on the right to life that gravitarão fussabout and the conclusions of this work. From the discussion in the highest court of the country (STF) of when life begins, so that this decision was dismissed on the unconstitutionality of Direct Action (ADI N) in order to elucidate whether the research with human stem cells embryonic violates the right to life, and if there is violation of human dignity.